With the availability of various cements for the permanent placement of indirect restorations, it is essential for the dental practitioner to consciously select the ideal cement for each indication.
With the availability of various cements for the permanent placement of indirect restorations, it is essential for the dental practitioner to consciously select the ideal cement for each indication.
With the availability of various cements for the permanent placement of indirect restorations, it is essential for the dental practitioner to consciously select the ideal cement for each indication.
This clinical case is an excellent example of where cement selection is critical for the success & longevity of indirect restorations. This starts with 3 key considerations: type of restoration, the type of substrate/material being used e.g. zirconia, metal, lithium disilicate, etc., and tooth preparation design. In very simplistic terms, RMGIC cements, like conventional cements, are dependent on mechanical retention, self-adhesive cements eliminate the need for separate conditioning with phosphoric acid and bonding agents, while adhesive cements require separate bonding steps, they offer the benefit of enhanced bond strength. (S.Langdon)